Posts Tagged ‘alice in wonderland’
EXCLUSIVE: Richard D. Zanuck Goes Down the Rabbit Hole with Alice and Wonderland
lately it seems like the word legend is thrown around pretty frequently but never has it been more perfectly apt then when used to describe Hollywood producer Richard D. Zanuck. Born into a show business dynasty as the son of former head of 20th Century Fox, Daryl Zanuck, he made a name for himself in 1975 when he collaborated with director Steven Spielberg to essentially create the summer blockbuster with the film Jaws. since then Zanuck has produced some of the most beloved and critically acclaimed films of his generation including The Verdict, Cocoon and Road To Perdition but it was ’1989s Driving Miss Daisy, which earned him an Academy Award for best Picture. recently Zanuck has stayed very busy producing hit films like Yes Man, The Book of Eli and Clash of the Titans, but it his relationship with visionary director Tim Burton that excites the seventy-five year old producer the most.
Zanuck has produced Burton‘s last five films including Planet of the Apes, Big Fish, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Sweeney Todd and Alice in Wonderland, three of which starred Burton‘s constant muse Johnny Depp, and the three are set to reunite shortly on an adaptation of the ’60s cult TV series, Dark Shadows. But now their latest collaboration, Alice in Wonderland, which has become the sixth highest grossing film worldwide of all-time is coming to Blu-ray and DVD on June 1st. We recently had a chance to speak with Richard D. Zanuck and the legendary producer talked about his illustrious career, his unique relationship with Burton and Depp, Dark Shadows and Burton‘s re-imagining of the classic Lewis Carroll novel. here is what he had to say:
Alice in Wonderland was to give “some framework of emotional grounding, and to try and make it feel more like a story as opposed to a series of events.” can you talk about his unique vision for the film and what you liked about his re-telling of the classic story?}
Richard D. Zanuck: well I actually want to get involved in everything that Tim is doing because it is, particularly at this point in my career, it’s very stimulating for me to watch his imagination run wild with these tales. When I say wild I don’t mean undisciplined it’s just he has such incredible vision and the way he puts everything a little off center, its just fascinating to watch and I’ve enjoyed these last five pictures with him. It’s been a wonderful experience. But the secret to Alice in Wonderland, and what attracted both of us actually was the product of the writer Linda Woolverton who wrote this and had the basic concept. the secret to it was making Alice an older girl, a young lady and that provided, and I hate to use the word arc but for lack of a better word it provided that character to start off in one place, experience a whole different set of experiences and then come back at the end a different, stronger personality.
So you have that wonderful character change during the piece and she became a woman during the course of the film. It starts out that she is very uncomfortable leading the life that’s been programmed for her and she is someone that would make her own decisions. during the course of her journey in Wonderland she becomes a very resolute, hardened person that makes her own decisions, fights her own battles, so when she returns to that life that she had led she is a different person. So that was not in the original Lewis Carroll story, that has been done over and over again. It’s hard to have that kind of arc with a nine year old, there is not going to be that much of a difference through the experiences. So I think that is what Tim meant when he said that he didn’t want Alice, as in the original story and the many versions that have done of this, to just walk through and meet a bunch of strange and curious characters but be virtually the same person.
So that was the big grounding, so to speak, that Linda Woolverton provided and that Tim gravitated to and I think that’s what’s made it all around the world a success. It’s a female empowerment story really, that’s the basic underlined theme of it and young girls have responded to it all around the world by going back to it repeatedly, particularly in the Far East, by the way. this Japanese business we’ve done, over $100 million in Japan alone, it’s become a cultural thing for young girls to see it and to see it more than once because it empowers them with great strength and the idea that they can do it on their own. their lives don’t have to fit a formula prescribed by others. So it’s all those things. That’s the long answer to your question but that’s what made it a success and that’s what Tim really honed in on.
You’ve worked with Tim Burton now on five films, can you talk about his process as an artist, a director and his unique vision behind the camera?
Richard D. Zanuck: Yeah it’s applied to everything that I’ve seen him do. You know, he is foremost an artist in the true sense of that. in New York they had for the last four months, it just finished in April and it started in November actually, the Museum of Modern Art devoted a tremendous section of their museum to his artwork. It’s all hung and framed. there are giant pieces of sculpture some fifteen feet high and then little tiny doodles that he made as a kid. It was the most remarkable thing. I’m saying all of that because he comes from a world of art. He is truly an artist. in fact, he is the only individual who has been so honored by the museum that is still alive and still in his prime.
at any rate he brings his artistry and his great imagination. It’s a joy and as I say very stimulating for me to see all of that work. It’s been like that on every film. I try to imagine before we start a days work, the night before I’d lie in bed trying to get off to sleep and imagine how he will present or attack the next day’s scene. I’ve been wrong every time because he always has a little different slant and a little different way that he is going to tell the story of that particular day’s work. Actors appreciate it because they recognize that he’s fresh, he puts them at ease, he lets them do their own thing and then he molds that thing. So it’s always been a pleasant experience with him and most producers would love to have their directors as productive and stimulating as he is. I mean there is never an outburst, he never seems to slow down and he’s just really fun to work with.
As a follow up to that, three of the Burton films you’ve worked on have also included his constant collaborator Johnny Depp, can you talk about the unique relationship that the two have together and what their working style is like on set now after collaborating so many times over the years?
Richard D. Zanuck: well it is very unique on and off the set. they remind me on the set in particular of two high school chums. they go off while the scene is being set-up and they’re off in a corner giggling. they have there own private jokes and they speak short hand to each other. They’re best friends. Johnny was really put on the major film map by Tim with Edward Scissorhands and they are devoted to one another. But they use almost sign language with one another. It’s fun to watch them because they have a lot of respect for one another and they both bring enormous talent to the table. Johnny for one is unlike any other star in that he will take the chances with these characters where most actors would be worried about their futures. He could have laid eggs with a lot of theses characters starting with Edward Scissorhands, Ed Wood, Willy Wonka in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Sweeney Todd, all of the ones that he’s done most actors would be scarred of but he takes it as a real challenge. Tim loves it because he loves doing these off beat, off kilter characters and stories so they are like a real team in terms of what they are trying to accomplish together. It’s fun to witness.
Finally, we wanted to ask you about the upcoming adaptation of the classic ’60s cult TV series “Dark Shadows” that you are producing, which will star Johnny Depp and be directed by Tim Burton. at one point you had said that you hoped filming would begin this summer, since its clearly not, where is the production at this point and when do you think you’ll begin filming?
Richard D. Zanuck: that film is still in the works but it’s been delayed a bit. We expected to do it much earlier, actually before Alice was finished. We must have been intoxicated when we thought that Tim could direct this picture while he was doing the post-production of Alice. Most of the post-production on Alice was done on computers and there were months and months of down time. at one point we thought that we could make it then and then we realized right away that Tim couldn’t do it. then that put it behind a couple of pictures that Johnny had lined up and right now we’re waiting for him to finish The Tourist with Angelina Jolie and then he is going to take some time off and then do Pirates of the Caribbean: on stranger Tides next.
It’s unlikely, while everybody intends to make the picture, and we’re still working on the script and all the rest, it’s unlikely that we can start it earlier than the beginning of next year. Johnny had committed and he has to do Pirates of the Caribbean: on stranger Tides first. He had a long-standing, firm, unchangeable contract to do that. That’s a big project and he doesn’t start that until later in the summer. So there you have it and we’re waiting in line. But it is still very much alive and we are currently working on the script.
The original show was on for several years and dealt with many different sci-fi topics from monsters and vampires to time travel and alternate universes, what elements do you hope to capture in this film and will the vampire, Barnabas Collins, still be the main character?
Richard D. Zanuck: the main character? Yes. But one of the problems we’ve had with the script is that there are hundreds of episodes of this and boiling it down to an hour and a half or two hour movie with one story has been a real challenge and that’s what we are doing now. But it will have all of the elements of the TV show. It won’t be high camp, obviously. It won’t be soap opera, which the show was. no, it will be scary, it’ll be very funny and it will carry the Tim Burton stamp of uniqueness.
Alice in Wonderland was released March 5th, 2010 and stars Mia Wasikowska, Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover, Matt Lucas, Stephen Fry, Michael Sheen. the film is directed by Tim Burton.
Playboy provides 3-D-lightful idea
Playboy‘s new 3-D centrefold makes me tingle for several reasons, including nostalgia.
You see, I beat Playboy to the punch by 16 years.
Unless you are dead or a Sens fan or both, you know we’re in a 3-D craze, thanks to Avatar. Alice In Wonderland was next through the looking glass. 3-D televisions debuted in Canada last month.
Hugh Hefner may be closing in on rigor mortis but he’s no dummy.
“What would people most like to see in 3-D?” he wondered aloud. “Probably a naked lady.”
So the June edition of his magazine, on stands Friday, features 2010 Playmate of the Year Hope Dworacyzk in a truly eye-popping pictorial.
You put on the disposable glasses, and the lovely Hope leaps off the page and into your eager arms.
Playboy hasn’t caused such a stir since it ran a scantily clad Marge Simpson.
But it’s hardly breaking new ground.
I ran a 3-D SUNshine Girl in this newspaper when Hope Dworacyzk was still a beanpole in braces.
In 1994, I was a young, hot-blooded managing editor. Like Hef when he started.
I got a Calgary graphics whiz to create the pixelgram Girl, and asked readers to identify a clue hidden in the frame.
The contest hotline flamed out after 200,000 calls.
“All over town,” we reported, “TTC drivers buried their noses in the Sun during coffee breaks. Athletes sat staring at Page 3 in dressing rooms. Across the city, people held the Sun front and centre.
“And all working to make our 3-D pixelgram beauty come into focus.”
Said one reader: “She just sort of popped out at me.”
Well, here she is again. stare at her a while. Relax your eyes. let ‘em blur. Then introduce yourself.
Sure, she’s a different kind of 3-D than Playboy’s. But Hef’s version isn’t new.
In 1953, he wanted to include a 3-D pictorial in the first issue but couldn’t afford the glasses. Marilyn Monroe was the centrefold. Imagine. Some like it hot in 3-D.
I’m pitching the brass around here on a 3-D Toronto Sun.
Oh, the thrill of opening the paper to have Sean Penn pop out and bop you on the nose. Penn is on Page 83 today, having copped a plea to pounding paparazzi.
Or see a Montreal Canadien swoosh about in 3-D. or a Habs fan. Rioting, probably.
They took a 3-D photo of Queen Victoria in 1851. They made Bwana Devil, the first major 3-D movie, in 1952.
So surely, in 2010, we can present mark Bonokoski in 3-D. Okay, okay, 4-D. In Dolby sound.
“3-D would work fine in newspapers,” Playboy photographer Stephen Wayda tells me. he did the June centrefold with a camera he designed, needing just 63 frames to produce the winner.
In it, Ms Dworacyzk wears a smile and offers you some wine. the glass is not the only thing that pops from the page. Playboy helpfully lists her attributes: 34C 23 35.
Careful, or they’ll give you a concussion.
Add a few clothes and, voila, a 3-D SUNshine Girl. Move her back to Page 3 and you have a gimmick: 3-D-on-3. (I hope editor Wallace is reading my column these days.)
Sports Illustrated has dabbled in 3-D swimsuits.
The UK Sun — no relation — plans a 3-D edition on June 5, leading into the World Cup of soccer.
To put it in a way the brass will understand: Imagine the advertisers lining up to hype their products in 3-D.
Last month, China’s Shiyan Evening News put out a 3-D ad section that had weddings, theme parks, hospitals and cars popping out all over.
I bet Ford would pay extra to have an Escape escape the bounds of newsprint and zoom toward you.
And, hey, imagine my column logo in 3-D. Maybe those stupid glasses would fall off.
Mike Strobel’s column runs Wednesday to Friday, and Sunday.
mike.strobel@sunmedia.ca or 416-947-2265.
Your Comments
- 28 Comments
- View/Leave Comment
What about showing what the pic actually is so maybe we know what to look for.I have never been able to see these images.Don’t know why.
Russell, may 13th 2010, 6:31pm
Good Morning Hollywood, March 23: 'Alice' in Fantasyland | The Wrap
In this morning’s roundup of movie news ‘n’ notes from around the web, ‘Alice’ prompts a film-business fantasy, and another writer learns the reality of studio accounting.
“It’s becoming increasingly clear that Disney’s March 5 release of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ may have helped trigger a dramatic tipping point in film history,” says Patrick Goldstein. the release, he says, may mark the end of theater owners’ resistance to shorter DVD windows, because the three-month window that Disney announced for “Alice” (below) obviously didn’t keep people from seeing the film in theaters. if that seems a bit overly optimistic – one big movie is not going to stop exhibitors from complaining about shrinking windows – Goldstein’s dream scenario of a “bold experiment” that ought to be tried is even more of a pipe dream. he envisions a future film like “The Bounty Hunter” or “Shutter Island” being released day-and-date in theaters and on video-on-demand … with the VOD price coming at a premium (he suggests $22.95), part of which the studio would then share with theater owners. Sounds like a fantasy to me, and I’m not talking about a film genre. (The Big Picture)
This one’s firmly in the dog-bites-man camp: author Michael Connelly has sued Paramount Pictures, claiming that the studio falsely inflated development costs for two of Connelly’s novels that were optioned by the studio but never made into films. the complaint centers on a 15-year option to make movies out of “Black Ice” and “The Black Echo”; the option was to have lapsed in January, giving Connelly the right to buy back the rights for Paramount’s development cost plus interest. but those costs, he says, were improperly inflated without documentation. People who’ve followed Hollywood’s accounting practices over the years are said to be shocked. (THR, Esq.)
What do we know about “How do you Know”? Not much, says the New York Times of James L. Brooks’ upcoming film, which may well be a dramedy about a female softball player with Reese Witherspoon as the softballer and Owen Wilson as a professional baseball pitcher. Other details are hard to come by, but the upshot is that “How do you Know,” due out from Sony at the end of the year, is the kind of film that studios have been avoiding lately: an expensive, adult, star-driven story featuring a variety of actors who don’t come cheap: Witherspoon, Wilson and Jack Nicholson among them. Can the man whose last film was the notably unsuccessful “Spanglish” overcome what the Times calls “Hollywood’s skittishness about relying on sophisticated pictures from even the biggest stars?” “Who the Hell Knows?” might be a more appropriate title. (The New York Times)
the Wall Street Journal says that the big story out of the South by Southwest festival was that it’s gotten really crowded. it strikes me that this is the story of every festival, pretty much all of which are full of people complaining that the fest used to be much cooler when it didn’t attract so many people. but between the 33 percent increase in film festival attendance over last year (11 percent for the more-established music festival), and the presence of high-profile debuts like “MacGruber” and “Kick-Ass,” Eric Kohn says long lines and big crowds were the talk of the town. (Speakeasy)
The Tribeca Film Festival announces yet another of its programs, this one called Tribeca all Access, an initiative created to “cultivate relationships between filmmakers from traditionally underrepresented communities and film industry executives.” Peter Knegt has the list of the 24 filmmakers invited to participate, out of a pool of more than 450 submissions. (indieWIRE)
Related Blogs
- Related Blogs on alice in wonderland
- Alice in Wonderland | Book Reviews
- Related Blogs on paramount pictures
- MoPix Update from WGBH- March 19
- Watch Madagascar : Escape 2 Africa Free | IMAGINATION of ENTERTAINMENT
Movie Review: ‘Alice in Wonderland’
In Tim Burton’s “Alice in Wonderland,” Alice has grown — not by “drink me” potion or “eat me” cake — into a 19-year-old girl.
Working from Linda Woolverton’s very Hollywood screenplay adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s classic tale, Burton shifts the story from a child Alice to a near-adult Alice, viewing her journey through a drearier, more dangerous looking-glass.
We glimpse the prim, Victorian child of Carroll’s tale in the film’s opening as she’s awakens from what sounds like her trip to Wonderland. Her father tells her that her deranged dreams do indeed mean she’s bonkers, but he assures, “All the best people are.”
It’s a neat line and it’s at the heart of Burton’s 3-D version of Carroll’s beloved book, which also draws heavily from its sequel, “Through the Looking-Glass.”
The film quickly fast forwards 13 years, and Alice (played by the startlingly promising Mia Wasikowska, who previously impressed watchers of HBO’s “In Treatment”), is lured back to Wonderland by the familiar, punctually paranoid rabbit (voiced by Michael Sheen).
She flees a white- and pastel-colored reality (where she is being arranged with great orchestration to marry a man she disdains) and falls down the hole.
Alice doesn’t remember her last trip to Wonderland. this time, the plot is slightly different. It’s Underland, not Wonderland. the tea party is more faded and ramshackle. Alice is beset by questions that she’s “the wrong Alice.”
Where the Alice of the 1865 book is confused and essentially on a journey of self-discovery, Burton’s Alice is more sure of herself.
“This is my dream. I make the path,” she says.
Burton’s “Alice” reflects today’s times more than Carroll’s era. There’s triumph over the “dominion over living things” practiced by the cruel, bigheaded Red Queen (a brilliantly thin-skinned Helena Bonham Carter), and there’s Alice’s girl power. By the end, she confidently returns to begin, of all things, a business endeavor in China.
Though Burton’s film boasts some excellent performances, as the caterpillar says to our heroine, it’s merely “almost Alice.”
‘Alice’ director was inspired by Grace Slick, not Lewis Carroll
LOS ANGELES – it wasn’t Lewis Carroll’s writing that inspireddirector Tim Burton to create his film version of the classic story”Alice in Wonderland.” it was how the story seeped into popculture.
“I’m from Burbank so we never heard of ‘Alice in Won-derland’except for the Disney cartoon, the Tom Petty video, the JeffersonAirplane (song “White Rabbit”),” Burton says. “I knew more about itfrom listening to music, other illustrations and artists that wouldincorporate that imagery into their work. That’s what made merealize the power of it.”
Despite having seen the characters from Carroll’s book becomedeeply ingrained in the culture, it wasn’t until he had successfulconverted his 1993 animated release “The Nightmare BeforeChristmas” from 2-D to 3-D that Burton finally decide to bringAlice to the big screen.
The trippiness of Carroll’s writing, says Burton, was a perfectfit with 3-D technology. Burton filmed the movie in 2-D and thenmanipulated the footage to make it appear in 3-D.
That was necessary because he used so many special effectsmethods – from green screens to computer generated backgrounds -there was really nothing on the set, other than actors, to film in3-D.
Just as Burton had noticed, the new “Alice” joins a long line offilm, TV and stage versions of the Carroll novels. That didn’tworry Burton.
“I had never seen a version I really liked, so I didn’t feellike there was a definitive version we were fighting against,”Burton says.